(no subject)
Jan. 13th, 2005 09:45 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The Washington Post reports that the Bush administration, which is raising $40 million in private funds for the most expensive inauguration in history next week, wants the District of Columbia, for the first time in history, to pay all of its own expenses -- estimated at more than $17 million. In order to do so, the district will be required to divert $11.9 million from federal homeland security funding earmarked for hospitals, firefighting equipment and transit command centers.
The city's costs include $8.8 million in overtime pay for police officers, $2.7 million to pay officers being sent from around the nation to help with the event, $3 million to construct reviewing stands and $2.5 million to place the entire city infrastructure on emergency status. More than 100 square blocks of the city will be closed to vehicular traffic for this first post-9/11 inauguration.
For all previous inaugurations, Congress has made a direct appropriation to the perennially cash-strapped city to cover most or all of its costs. Boston and New York also each got $50 million from the federal government to cover costs associated with last year's party conventions, although those are private events while the inauguration is an official celebration.
Critics from many quarters have asked whether it is even appropriate to have an extravagant, boisterous inauguration, given that soldiers are dying daily in Iraq and hundreds of thousands are still suffering the catastrophic effects of the South Asia tsunami.
********
I am so not surprised.
Remember: Bush originally offered 15 million to tsunami aid - less than HALF of what his inauguration will cost. I think we know where his priorities are.
The city's costs include $8.8 million in overtime pay for police officers, $2.7 million to pay officers being sent from around the nation to help with the event, $3 million to construct reviewing stands and $2.5 million to place the entire city infrastructure on emergency status. More than 100 square blocks of the city will be closed to vehicular traffic for this first post-9/11 inauguration.
For all previous inaugurations, Congress has made a direct appropriation to the perennially cash-strapped city to cover most or all of its costs. Boston and New York also each got $50 million from the federal government to cover costs associated with last year's party conventions, although those are private events while the inauguration is an official celebration.
Critics from many quarters have asked whether it is even appropriate to have an extravagant, boisterous inauguration, given that soldiers are dying daily in Iraq and hundreds of thousands are still suffering the catastrophic effects of the South Asia tsunami.
********
I am so not surprised.
Remember: Bush originally offered 15 million to tsunami aid - less than HALF of what his inauguration will cost. I think we know where his priorities are.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-13 04:04 pm (UTC)It isn't all that hard. It mostly involves one finger.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-13 04:14 pm (UTC)We are spending all of this money so a bunch of people can celebrate and pat themselves on the back for a job well-done (winning an election by a narrow margin that was still rife with voting problems even after all the hype from four years ago). Meanwhile, there are SO MANY OTHER PLACES that money could be better-spent.
Does this improve our image to the world? Does this foster good will? Peace among nations? Generate a giving spirit?
I don't think so, and those are the reasons I can think of to spend gobs of money on luxury items at this juncture.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-13 05:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-13 06:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-14 01:13 am (UTC)For that matter, it says here in the article you're quoting that the Homeland Security money could be used to pay the costs associated with the inauguration, since it hadn't been spent on anything else. Knowing the incredible efficiency of the DC city government, they'd probably forgotten they had the grant money sitting around. This is the same outfit, mind you, that bent over for Major League Baseball and agreed to build a new stadium with public funding, and which routinely leads the nation in per-pupil school spending while managing to trail Mississippi in student achievement.
But yeah, you're right, what the hell are we thinking, throwing a bash to celebrate W's inauguration (complete with Kid Rock, woo!) when people are dying in Iraq? For that matter, why did we celebrate Clinton's inaugural back in '91 when people were dying in Somalia and Bosnia? Gosh, there's really no reason at all for anyone to have a good time this year, what with the tsunami and the ongoing slaughter in the Sudan and the horrible repression continuing in Tibet. Let's just cancel Marscon and Anime Detour and Convergence too, and sit around in sackcloth and ashes this year meditating on how sad the world is and what fucked-up people live in it. Yeah, that's the ticket. *rolls eyes*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: