![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
In light of the second revelation this month that the Bush administration had hired a Republican-friendly pundit to help promote policy initiatives -- payments that were kept hidden from readers and viewers -- conservative commentators are calling on the White House to come clean and detail any other controversial agreements. The opinion makers say they don't want a black cloud of suspicion hanging over their own columns and broadcasts.
"If other contracts exist, then the White House should disclose them," says Jonah Goldberg, editor at large for National Review Online.
***
There's a Freedom of Information Act request about this - and they optimistically think that it will reveal any other wrongdoing.
But let's review: We now have evidence and admission that two columnists were paid by the Administration to push their policies, and this was done without full disclosure to the public that these "opinions" had been bought and paid for.
That's just skanky. In my RIGHTEOUS opinion.
"If other contracts exist, then the White House should disclose them," says Jonah Goldberg, editor at large for National Review Online.
***
There's a Freedom of Information Act request about this - and they optimistically think that it will reveal any other wrongdoing.
But let's review: We now have evidence and admission that two columnists were paid by the Administration to push their policies, and this was done without full disclosure to the public that these "opinions" had been bought and paid for.
That's just skanky. In my RIGHTEOUS opinion.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 04:52 pm (UTC)Mmmmm. Caves.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-28 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-28 12:24 pm (UTC)I don't think the government ought to be doing it in either case, but as Mark Levin says, this isn't ethics, this is "gotcha".
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:CBS and Dan Rather
Date: 2005-01-28 09:40 pm (UTC)