More traffic complaints
Feb. 17th, 2005 09:40 amWhat's with this Minneapolitan fetish for "No turn on Red"? WTF is that about??
Now, don't get me wrong - when used at truly dangerous intersections, I am all for it. But there are few that are so marked that I would consider to be dangerous.
And then there are the truly dangerous intersections that DON'T have them. These drive me crazy from both directions. (or this one stop-sign I regularly encounter that is on a busy street. And they let the cars park all the way to the corner, so you have NO visibility for oncoming traffic! Especially if you drive a sensible car like I do - a Tercel - and an SUV is parked on the corner. You end up playing the peek-a-boo game with your car. YIKE!)
No, what we have here in Minneapolis is fund-raising. Especially South Minneapolis. At plain-jane intersections that have good visibility in all directions, you still have these "no turn on red" signs.
I read a study about new traffic concepts where some places are trying out "mixed use" traffic areas. Sidewalks aren't there, the road isn't clearly marked - since there is no clear definition, people slow down and PAY ATTENTION.
Because much of our driving problems today have to do with everybody knowing the rules and therefore ceasing to pay attention. If I'm driving on the road, you should be on the sidewalk and when you're not on the sidewalk - I'm not prepared to adjust and accidents happen.
Of course, much of the problems in the world today are due to people not paying attention...
[Have you seen the latest? States wanting to pass legislation barring universities teaching "unacceptable" things. Barring political statements, etc. Freedom of Speech? Old-fashioned apparently.]
Now, don't get me wrong - when used at truly dangerous intersections, I am all for it. But there are few that are so marked that I would consider to be dangerous.
And then there are the truly dangerous intersections that DON'T have them. These drive me crazy from both directions. (or this one stop-sign I regularly encounter that is on a busy street. And they let the cars park all the way to the corner, so you have NO visibility for oncoming traffic! Especially if you drive a sensible car like I do - a Tercel - and an SUV is parked on the corner. You end up playing the peek-a-boo game with your car. YIKE!)
No, what we have here in Minneapolis is fund-raising. Especially South Minneapolis. At plain-jane intersections that have good visibility in all directions, you still have these "no turn on red" signs.
I read a study about new traffic concepts where some places are trying out "mixed use" traffic areas. Sidewalks aren't there, the road isn't clearly marked - since there is no clear definition, people slow down and PAY ATTENTION.
Because much of our driving problems today have to do with everybody knowing the rules and therefore ceasing to pay attention. If I'm driving on the road, you should be on the sidewalk and when you're not on the sidewalk - I'm not prepared to adjust and accidents happen.
Of course, much of the problems in the world today are due to people not paying attention...
[Have you seen the latest? States wanting to pass legislation barring universities teaching "unacceptable" things. Barring political statements, etc. Freedom of Speech? Old-fashioned apparently.]