I mutilate cats
May. 8th, 2003 01:02 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Both my cats are front-declawed.
I don't see anything wrong with the procedure.
It is related to the fact that I don't see anything wrong with having indoors-only cats. An indoor cat lives longer and is healthier and is not likely to catch diseases, get run over, or harmed by random passersby.
I equate declawing with an appendectomy. Yes, the surgery can hurt, but they give you drugs. And you're removing a bit of anatomy that serves no useful purpose in the current structure.
I am cold-blooded like that.
NOTE: I declawed my cats when they were still kittens. I do not advocate declawing an adult cat.
I don't see anything wrong with the procedure.
It is related to the fact that I don't see anything wrong with having indoors-only cats. An indoor cat lives longer and is healthier and is not likely to catch diseases, get run over, or harmed by random passersby.
I equate declawing with an appendectomy. Yes, the surgery can hurt, but they give you drugs. And you're removing a bit of anatomy that serves no useful purpose in the current structure.
I am cold-blooded like that.
NOTE: I declawed my cats when they were still kittens. I do not advocate declawing an adult cat.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 11:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 11:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 11:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 11:43 am (UTC)I agree with you on the indoor cats bit, but I sometimes feel very sorry for my poor, bored, indoor-only kitties. Not enough to let them outside, mind, but cats work wonders at inducing guilt.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 02:42 pm (UTC)You should equate it to having the first knuckle of your fingers/toes removed. Because that's what the procedure is. =)
Having it done younger doesn't seem to have a big impact on the cats I've seen in my years working in a vet clinic.
I'm not against others declawing their kitties; I'm only against them declawing their kitties and then letting them go outside without their natural defenses. I feel the same way about folks who tether their cats outside.
I also accept property damage is a potential result of my decision not to declaw.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 03:13 pm (UTC)But a cat doesn't *need* their finger knuckle if they are an indoor cat. They don't need to climb or defend themselves. Hence, my appendix analogy. I do need my fingers to function, but an indoor cat - to me - doesn't need their claws to function.
And no, never declaw a cat that's going to go outdoors. And I don't like declawing an older cat because they have established behaviors and personalities that will be impacted, at least more so than a 6 month kitty will.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-09 06:21 am (UTC)I understand your point, but disagree on a technical/semantic level. The analogy of claws<->appendix is spurious, in that there's no known use for an appendix, but there are clear uses for claws. And, technically, you don't *need* your first knuckles to function, either. =)
There is a whole line of argument [which I only partially agree with] from animal rights folks that kitties do indeed need to climb/claw/defend themselves to truly be cats. *shrug*
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 02:43 pm (UTC)for the record, i'm one of the whackos who think that cats who are pets should be indoors cats. and outdoors cats should be caught and tamed and made into indoors cats.
also one of the people who doesn't currently have a cat, due to allergies in the household.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 03:14 pm (UTC)Since I dont' think keeping a cat indoors is cruel, I'm not likely to think declawing them is cruel.
Indoors cat = declawed cat to me.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-09 06:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-09 07:26 am (UTC)It's bad enough that my cats chew things.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 03:26 pm (UTC)There many many options out there. Clipping the claws yourself regularly. Plastic caps. A different kind of surgery where they clip the tendon instead of removing the joint.
The first is time consuming and uncomfortable to the cat if it doesn't happen on time because they can get ingrown claws (Kiki, my cat does). The second is expensive and often involves numerous trips to the vet when the cats fall off. The last is more humane, but still involves clipping the claws often.
All choices have good points and bad points. If there's less turmoil for you and your pets for them to be declawed, then do it. It's a practical choice that I won't fault you for.
As for going outside, there's people that claim you're cruel if you don't let a cat outside. There's people that claim you're cruel if you ever do. Cat are domesticated animals. This means for the most part, we've changed them through breeding to the point where they are dependant on humans for a healthy happily life. The instinct of a wild cat does not apply. A house cat is not wild.
Hey it's America
Date: 2003-05-08 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 09:38 pm (UTC)I used to let the cats play with cheap balloons. They learned not to use their claws.
Me too.
Date: 2003-05-09 05:33 am (UTC)And now they can stretch and scratch and jump and not get yelled at or shot with water every time they turn around. They still climb/jump (always have to be as tall as possible) all the time, and they play and chase each other all over.
They don't seem unhappy that they can't go outside. They are healthy. They always have food. They always have heat. If they are sick they are taken care of.
Somehow, I can't see myself as an evil, awful pet-owner who should not be allowed to have pets.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2003-05-09 06:05 pm (UTC)