windelina: (Lenore)
[personal profile] windelina
Long-Term Plan Sought For Terror Suspects

By Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, January 2, 2005; Page A01

Administration officials are preparing long-range plans for indefinitely imprisoning suspected terrorists whom they do not want to set free or turn over to courts in the United States or other countries, according to intelligence, defense and diplomatic officials.

The Pentagon and the CIA have asked the White House to decide on a more permanent approach for potentially lifetime detentions, including for hundreds of people now in military and CIA custody whom the government does not have enough evidence to charge in courts. The outcome of the review, which also involves the State Department, would also affect those expected to be captured in the course of future counterterrorism operations.

"We've been operating in the moment because that's what has been required," said a senior administration official involved in the discussions, who said the current detention system has strained relations between the United States and other countries. "Now we can take a breath. We have the ability and need to look at long-term solutions."

One proposal under review is the transfer of large numbers of Afghan, Saudi and Yemeni detainees from the military's Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, detention center into new U.S.-built prisons in their home countries. The prisons would be operated by those countries, but the State Department, where this idea originated, would ask them to abide by recognized human rights standards and would monitor compliance, the senior administration official said.

As part of a solution, the Defense Department, which holds 500 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, plans to ask Congress for $25 million to build a 200-bed prison to hold detainees who are unlikely to ever go through a military tribunal for lack of evidence, according to defense officials.

The new prison, dubbed Camp 6, would allow inmates more comfort and freedom than they have now, and would be designed for prisoners the government believes have no more intelligence to share, the officials said. It would be modeled on a U.S. prison and would allow socializing among inmates.

"Since global war on terror is a long-term effort, it makes sense for us to be looking at solutions for long-term problems," said Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman. "This has been evolutionary, but we are at a point in time where we have to say, 'How do you deal with them in the long term?' "

The administration considers its toughest detention problem to involve the prisoners held by the CIA. The CIA has been scurrying since Sept. 11, 2001, to find secure locations abroad where it could detain and interrogate captives without risk of discovery, and without having to give them access to legal proceedings.

Little is known about the CIA's captives, the conditions under which they are kept -- or the procedures used to decide how long they are held or when they may be freed. That has prompted criticism from human rights groups, and from some in Congress and the administration, who say the lack of scrutiny or oversight creates an unacceptable risk of abuse.

Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.), vice chairman of the House intelligence committee who has received classified briefings on the CIA's detainees and interrogation methods, said that given the long-term nature of the detention situation, "I think there should be a public debate about whether the entire system should be secret.

"The details about the system may need to remain secret," Harman said. At the least, she said, detainees should be registered so that their treatment can be tracked and monitored within the government. "This is complicated. We don't want to set up a bureaucracy that ends up making it impossible to protect sources and informants who operate within the groups we want to penetrate."

The CIA is believed to be holding fewer than three dozen al Qaeda leaders in prison. The agency holds most, if not all, of the top captured al Qaeda leaders, including Khalid Sheik Mohammed, Ramzi Binalshibh, Abu Zubaida and the lead Southeast Asia terrorist, Nurjaman Riduan Isamuddin, known as Hambali.

CIA detention facilities have been located on an off-limits corner of the Bagram air base in Afghanistan, on ships at sea and on Britain's Diego Garcia island in the Indian Ocean. The Washington Post reported last month that the CIA has also maintained a facility within the Pentagon's Guantanamo Bay complex, though it is unclear whether it is still in use.

In contrast to the CIA, the military produced and declassified hundreds of pages of documents about its detention and interrogation procedures after the Abu Ghraib prison scandal. And the military detainees are guaranteed access to the International Committee of the Red Cross and, as a result of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, have the right to challenge their imprisonment in federal court.

Date: 2005-01-04 08:06 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Vackovich, how can you say these people only want to do harm to the US? The whole point is that we don't have enough evidence to be able to say that. If we did, we wouldn't need to build special prisons to house them indefinitely. We would try them and, if found guilty, convict them.

You might just laugh this off, but how about really considering the following scenario? What if you were in another country and, for whatever reason, were suspected of being a threat to their safety. Say they mistook you for a terrorist. So, while they investigate, they throw you in jail without any access to legal counsel. The investigation doesn't turn up any damning evidence against you, at least not enough to bring you to trial, yet, there's still that tip or whatever it was that made them suspect you in the first place. Unable to try you, they just leave you in jail to rot because they've made up their minds that you *might* be dangerous. But you'd be ok with staying in prison with no hope of release, right? You wouldn't expect them to risk harm to their own citizens, would you? Never mind that they never convicted you of a crime.

By the way, I do understand and agree that Constitutional rights do not extend to foreigners. However, that doesn't mean that we, as a nation, shouldn't strive to be just. My opinion has nothing to do with pleasing UN governments, either. It's not about politics, it's about people's lives.

Thank you. By the way, I'm posting anonymously b/c I'm not a registered user.

Dear Anonymous

Date: 2005-01-04 09:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vackovich.livejournal.com
You seem reasonable and have some salient points. Let me address them:

1. I am sure everyone they would like to keep incarcerated in this new building is of fine moral character and it is an injustice to put people so close to sainthood in jail. What kind of individuals do you think the government would build this facility for? Do you really believe that the US government is incarcerates people because they got nothing better to do?

2. Your scenerio of incarceration in a foreign country could happen if I was in many other second and third world countries and some first world countries. If anything, most of the prisoners are treated better than they would be by their own governments. Certainly better treatment than I would if I was in one of their prisons. Don't forget they have the media on their side because if it bleeds, it leads. Too bad the media does not delve what happens to prisoners and hostages of the terrorists in the detail they do the "torture" at the hands of the American captors. Why is it so hard to show the deaths and decapitation of Amercian and foreign citizens on TV during the nightly news? It's not like I have not seen two million murders on telvision by this point deemed as entertainment on primetime so what is a few rolling heads of real people to the total?

3. The US has set the bar of being just far higher than any other country on the planet. It is time of the others countries of the world to play catch up and stop pretending they are on the moral high ground.

So if you reading Anonymous, you can reply to me at jamesgreaves@hotmail.com instead of Windelina's very nice, cool, happy journal.

Profile

windelina: (Default)
windelina

April 2008

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 07:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios